Yes friends, why noun when we can verb? No matter where I look, mobius just doesn't see any persons, places or thangs. That is why they call them "persons", "places" and "thangs"! All mobius beholds as he insides outsides is One, suffused with an incessant dynamism, a continuous discontinuous becoming. Yes there are even more than two paths you can go by: Call it what you like: "plane of consistency", "Shiva", "Substance", "All That Is", "Lord of the Meeting Rivers", "Noosphere", but call it and, in calling it, notice that you are carrying out an action, a deliberate choice of creative production, destruction, dissolution, preservation, or, even, grace, praise Zarathustra. Yes, mobius is with Howard Odum, who wanted us all to learn to speak alittle "energese", and Brian Rotman, who points us all in the direction of diagramming. Just say "Verb to the Noun-o-sphere!"
"Rather, all of these measures may provide distinct glimpses into the same distributed state of long-distance reverberation."
For 13.7 Billion years or so, Universe has unfolded. Tuned to thermodynamics, this expanding event in space time rendered dissipative structures: The Great Red Spot of Jupiter renders more entropy than Jupiter devoid of said malestrom. Some networks of dissipative structures seem to notice that they are in fact dissipative structures, and begin looking for its place, forgetting that dissipative structures, despite their name, are dynamic events rather than locations.
"Our results suggest that in the search for neural correlates of consciousness, time-domain, frequency-domain, and causality-based electrophysiological measures should not be seen as competing possibilities. Rather, all of these measures may provide distinct glimpses into the same distributed state of long-distance reverberation."
